The vestry's position continues to be, in part, that Judge Strobel extracted from Lancaster & Anastasia the concession before trial rolled forward, September 23-25, 2015, that the outcome of that trial would be dispositive of the "Three Related Cases." In addition, based on the 2014 appeals court decision, the Bush group is not the legal rector, wardens, and vestry and does not have standing to sue in the "Related Cases".
It appears that the vestry's counsel will move again for the judge to dismiss the "Related Cases" based on lack of standing by the Bush group and award punitive damages to the vestry. We'll see how this goes.